Minglang Zhou

Headlines on re-education camps in Xinjiang and a forced switch to Mandarin as the language of instruction in Inner Mongolian primary schools have brought concern in the international community about the wellbeing of China’s ethnic minorities. To address this concern, the current article examines China's minority police changes under Xi Jinping in the last few years.

Language standardization is the core of language policy and language planning (LPLP), which are two different sides of the same coin. Focusing on speakers, language policy decides which language – or variety of a lan- guage – students should learn, teachers should use in schools, officials should adopt in government, employers and employees should converse in when conducting business and people should speak in public. On the other hand, by targeting languages, language planning engages the processes of selecting a standard variety or a standard language (status planning) and normalizing the selected language’s or variety’s grammar, vocabulary, pro- nunciation and scripts (corpus planning) so that it may best fulfil its desig- nated functions. Thus, language standardization may be broadly viewed from the perspective of language policy, of language planning or of both. This chapter takes this broad perspective of the standardization of minor- ity languages – languages that are either not spoken by the majority of citi- zens or not designated as the national or official languages of a nation-state.

This text considers contemporary China’s language ideology and how it supports China as a rising global power player. It examines the materialization of this ideology as China’s language order unfolds on two front, promoting Putonghua domestically and globally, alongside its economic growth and military expansion. Within the conceptual framework of language ideology and language order and using PRC policy documents, education annals, and fieldwork, this book explores how China’s language ideology is related to its growing global power as well as its domestic and global outreaches. It also addresses how this ideology has been materialized as a language order in terms of institutional development and support, and what impact these choices are having on China and the world. Focusing on the relationship between language ideology and language order, the book highlights a closer and coherent linguistic association between China’s domestic drive and global outreach since the turn of the century.