Avital Karpman

One site of Hebrew study has been virtually ignored by stakeholders in the enterprise: Hebrew language programs at American public schools. Despite the fact that these programs exist – and in many cases are expanding and thriving – they remain a virtual black box in Jewish educational research, and are often disconnected from broader Jewish communal and institutional structures. We contend, on the other hand, that Hebrew language instruction, even in public schools, has implications for Jewish education.

In the past decade, there has been a resurgence in the study of Hebrew in traditional andcharterpublicschools. However, the types of schools teaching Hebrew and the demographics of students studying Hebrew do not resemble those of earlier iterations of public school Hebrew programs that trace back to the early 20th century. Although the majority of Hebrew programs still disproportionately serve Jewish students, many schools in urban and suburban districts across the country are teaching Hebrew to students from diverse racial, religious, linguistic, and ethnic backgrounds. This project set out to take measure of these programs and provide some baseline information about Hebrew teaching in public schools in 2018 by investigating their demographics, instructional approaches, and language learning objectives.

For several decades, researchers have studied the field of heritage language (HL) teaching and learning. The intention of this review is to analyze these studies in order to find broader and more specific applications to inform the current situation in the Hebrew class. These ap- plications are limited for several reasons. First, virtually all HL studies focus on the children of immigrants who speak or are learning the new region’s majority language while attempting to preserve their HL (usually their home language). Most young American Hebrew learners, apart from a number of children of Israeli immigrants, speak English as their home and first language (L1). Second, though prior studies of HL learning are numerous, the research usually consists of qualitative case studies focusing on one aspect of learning (for example, attitudes toward the teacher, reactions to class activities, or parental influences on learning). There is very little in-depth analysis or connection of results and implications. Third, “He- brew” is an umbrella term1 that includes biblical, liturgical, literary, modern and other genres and uses of the language and that can be meaningful for social, communal, reli- gious, affective, nostalgic, nationalistic, and instrumental reasons. It is difficult to pinpoint which Hebrew we can study and compare to other HLs.

Avital Karpman, Hebbrew Program Director, was an invited speaker for a virtual conversation on "Re-imagining The Future Of Hebrew In America," with Sharon Avni, Professor, BMCC. The event was sponsored by CASJE (Collaborative for Applied Studies in Jewish Education).

 

Avital Karpman, Hebbrew Program Director, was an invited speaker for a virtual conversation on "Re-imagining The Future Of Hebrew In America," with Sharon Avni, Professor, BMCC. The event was sponsored by CASJE (Collaborative for Applied Studies in Jewish Education).