Skip to main content
Skip to main content

SLA Invited Lecture: Rod Ellis

SLA guest speaker Ron Ellis

SLA Invited Lecture: Rod Ellis

School of Languages, Literatures, and Cultures Thursday, February 10, 2022 5:00 pm - 6:00 pm Online, Zoom

Rod Ellis is a distinguished Research Professor in Curtin University (Australia), a longstanding professor at Anaheim University, a visiting professor at Shanghai International Studies University, and an Emeritus Distinguished Professor of the University of Auckland. He is also a fellow of the Royal Society of New Zealand. He has written extensively on second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. His most recent (co-authored) book is Task-based Language Teaching: Theory and Practice (2020) published by Cambridge University Press. 

Abstract
The advocacy of task-based language teaching (TBLT) has the characteristics of a movement as it seeks to replace the view that teaching a language entails treating a language as a set of objects that can be learned systematically bit by bit with the view that language is a tool for communicating and can best be acquired through learning how to communicate.  Inevitably, this movement has aroused resistance and the reassertion of the merits of more traditional, object-oriented teaching (Bruton, 2002; Sheen, 1994; Swan, 2005). My starting point is these critiques and the responses of advocates of TBLT (Ellis, 2009; Long, 2016) to what they see as fundamental misunderstandings about the principles that inform TBLT and its actual implementation.  From there, however, I want to move on to examine a number of real problems that TBLT faces - such as how a ‘task’ should be defined, how to determine task complexity and sequence tasks, and the role of explicit instruction. I will conclude by arguing that – as is often the case when positions are presented as absolute and incompatible – that there is need for a compromise and this might be achieved by means of a hybrid/ modular syllabus that allows for both an object-oriented and a tool-oriented view of language learning and teaching.

Readings:
1.    Ellis, R. (2009). Task-based language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstandings.  International Journal of Applied Linguistics 19, 221–246.
2.    Long, M. H. (2016).  In defence of tasks and TBLT: Nonissues and real issues.  Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 5–33.
3.    Ellis, R. (2017). Moving task-based language teaching forward. Language Teaching, 50 (4),  507-526.

Add to Calendar 02/10/22 17:00:00 02/10/22 18:00:00 America/New_York SLA Invited Lecture: Rod Ellis

Rod Ellis is a distinguished Research Professor in Curtin University (Australia), a longstanding professor at Anaheim University, a visiting professor at Shanghai International Studies University, and an Emeritus Distinguished Professor of the University of Auckland. He is also a fellow of the Royal Society of New Zealand. He has written extensively on second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. His most recent (co-authored) book is Task-based Language Teaching: Theory and Practice (2020) published by Cambridge University Press. 

Abstract
The advocacy of task-based language teaching (TBLT) has the characteristics of a movement as it seeks to replace the view that teaching a language entails treating a language as a set of objects that can be learned systematically bit by bit with the view that language is a tool for communicating and can best be acquired through learning how to communicate.  Inevitably, this movement has aroused resistance and the reassertion of the merits of more traditional, object-oriented teaching (Bruton, 2002; Sheen, 1994; Swan, 2005). My starting point is these critiques and the responses of advocates of TBLT (Ellis, 2009; Long, 2016) to what they see as fundamental misunderstandings about the principles that inform TBLT and its actual implementation.  From there, however, I want to move on to examine a number of real problems that TBLT faces - such as how a ‘task’ should be defined, how to determine task complexity and sequence tasks, and the role of explicit instruction. I will conclude by arguing that – as is often the case when positions are presented as absolute and incompatible – that there is need for a compromise and this might be achieved by means of a hybrid/ modular syllabus that allows for both an object-oriented and a tool-oriented view of language learning and teaching.

Readings:
1.    Ellis, R. (2009). Task-based language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstandings.  International Journal of Applied Linguistics 19, 221–246.
2.    Long, M. H. (2016).  In defence of tasks and TBLT: Nonissues and real issues.  Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 5–33.
3.    Ellis, R. (2017). Moving task-based language teaching forward. Language Teaching, 50 (4),  507-526.

Online false

Organization

Contact

Tetiana Tytko
ttytko@umd.edu

Cost

FREE